This is a story about a 15-year-old who has been billing her mother for emotional labor, what the invoices say, and what the mother — a thoughtful, accomplished, slightly shell-shocked woman in her late forties — has done in response.
The teenager I will call Iris, because that is what she has asked to be called, and because she has, with the gravity of a person twice her age, signed a permission form allowing me to write about her on the condition that I “do not make her sound stupid.” (She is fifteen. She is not stupid. I will not make her sound stupid.)
Her mother — I will call her Diane, because Diane is fifty and has earned the right to a sturdy name — is a healthcare executive in Seattle. She has been a single mother since Iris was four. She has done, by every account I have been given, a remarkable job.
In late January, Iris began sending Diane monthly Venmo requests.
The first invoice
The first request arrived on a Sunday evening. It was for $23.50. The description, which Iris had typed into the Venmo memo field, read: “household management & emotional regulation, January.”
Diane read the request three times. She then walked into the living room, where Iris was lying upside down on the couch watching a video about competitive cake decorating, and said: “Iris. What is this.”
Iris, without looking away from the cake decorating video, said: “It’s my invoice.”
Diane said: “For what.”
Iris said: “I sent it through Venmo so the description is there. Did you not read it.”
Diane said: “I read it. I would like more detail.”
Iris paused the cake decorating video. She sat up. She turned her body so she was facing her mother directly. She said, with the steady tone of a person presenting a slide deck:
“In January, I managed seventeen logistical situations on your behalf, including three you do not know about. I performed emotional labor on four separate evenings when you came home upset about work. I did not tell you that I was performing emotional labor at the time, because the labor would not have been effective if you had known I was performing it. I am charging you below market. I have done research.”
She lay back down. She pressed play on the cake decorating video.
Diane paid the invoice.
The second invoice
The second invoice arrived in early March. It was for $31.75. The description read: “household management & emotional regulation + grandmother phone call mediation, February.”
Diane, who had spent the intervening weeks in a state of what she described to me as “low-grade philosophical disorientation,” did not ask questions this time. She paid the invoice. She did, however, take a screenshot.
The screenshot is on her phone. She has shown it to me. It is filed in a Notes app folder she has titled “Iris business correspondence.”
The folder contains, as of this writing, six entries.
What the invoices actually cover
I asked Iris, during a phone call her mother had agreed to and which Iris had, in advance, allotted “twenty-two minutes,” whether she could break down what she was actually billing for.
She said yes. She said she had prepared.
She said: “I am billing for things that, if you hired a person to do them, you would pay them to do them. Therapists charge for emotional regulation. Project managers charge for logistical coordination. Conflict mediators charge for mediating conflicts. I am doing those things. I am not asking to be paid like a professional. I am asking to be paid like a child who is also a person.”
I said: “Can you give me an example.”
She said: “Last month, on the night my mother came home from her quarterly review and was sad, I knew without her telling me that the meeting had gone badly. I made her tea. I asked her what she wanted to watch. I let her pick. I did not bring up the fact that I needed her to sign a permission slip for a field trip the next morning, because I knew she would say yes and then feel bad later that she had not been more present in the moment. I waited until the next morning. I am billing twelve dollars for that night.”
I said: “That seems reasonable.”
She said: “I know.”
What Diane has done
Diane has now paid six invoices. The total, across five months, is $179.25.
She has, in conversations with me, used the word “demoralized” twice and the word “moved” three times. She is uncertain which of these is correct. She has told me she does not know whether what she is doing — paying her teenage daughter for emotional labor — is wise parenting, or terrible parenting, or some new category of parenting that has not yet been named, and which she is, by paying the invoices, helping to invent.
She has consulted, in approximately this order: her own therapist, her sister, two friends, a parenting podcast, and a Reddit thread she found at 1 a.m. The therapist was supportive. The sister was alarmed. One friend was supportive and one was alarmed. The parenting podcast had not addressed the issue. The Reddit thread had three replies, two of which were people sharing similar stories and one of which was a person aggressively recommending a book.
She has not, she told me, considered stopping.
When I asked her why, she said: “Because she’s right.”
The escalation
In April, Iris sent her first non-monthly invoice. It was for $4.00. The description read: “ad-hoc emotional regulation, Monday at 8:47 p.m.” The line item referred to a moment when Diane had come into the kitchen, sat down at the counter, sighed in a particular way, and Iris had said, without looking up from her homework: “Do you want me to ask, or do you want me to not ask.”
Diane had said: “Don’t ask.”
Iris had said: “Okay.”
The total time elapsed, by Iris’s accounting, was eleven seconds.
She charged four dollars.
Diane paid it within the hour.
She has, since April, paid two additional ad-hoc invoices. The total, with the monthly invoices, is now $211.00.
(For a related earlier piece, see the Wattalife story about the woman whose therapist had been retired for two years — another modern arrangement in which the labor was real but the role was something else entirely.)
What Iris plans to do with the money
I asked Iris, in our twenty-two-minute phone call, what she was doing with the money.
She said: “I am saving it. I have a goal. I will not tell you the goal.”
I said: “Why won’t you tell me the goal.”
She said: “Because if I tell you, it will become a thing my mother thinks about, and right now it is not a thing my mother thinks about, and I would like to keep it that way.”
I said: “Fair.”
She said: “Thank you.”
What it actually is
I have, in the four weeks since I first heard about Iris, given a lot of thought to what this story is. I do not have a tidy answer. I will give you the version I have come closest to.
A child, in a household with one parent, has been quietly performing the kind of work that, when adults perform it, is recognized as work — the labor of noticing, of timing, of choosing not to ask, of choosing what to watch, of remembering that the field trip permission slip can wait until morning. She has decided, at fifteen, that this work has value. She has decided to charge for it. She has decided, in doing so, to make it visible.
The mother, who has spent fifteen years doing the same work — and a lot more — without ever charging for it, has decided to pay.
She does not know what she is teaching her daughter by doing this. She does not know what her daughter is teaching her by asking. She knows only that, every month, an invoice arrives, and every month, she pays it, and every month, her daughter says “thanks Mom” in a way that is, she has told me, both casual and faintly professional.
Diane paid the most recent invoice on Tuesday. It was for $26.50. It included, for the first time, a small footnote in the Venmo memo field.
The footnote read: “rate increase next month — will give 30 days notice.”
—
Margot Hale is the editor of Wattalife. She does not have children. She has, in the course of reporting this story, considered whether she has, on multiple occasions, performed unbilled emotional labor for adults in her life. She is preparing the invoices.